Election buffs are in for an exciting spring; and for every party it will be unusually tense. For the first time since Brexit and the outbreak of Covid, millions of real votes, as distinct from opinion polls, will reveal the mood of the nation. In the wake of the pandemic, last week’s Budget and the bitter conflict between Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon, politicians in all parties and all parts of Britain will be anxious to find out what that mood is.
What is more, this year’s elections will be record-breaking. Because of the pandemic, none were held last year. They were postponed until this May, so that they could be held along with the contests due this year anyway. It will be a buy-one-get-one-free election day – the largest round of contests that Britain has ever seen outside a general election.
On Thursday May 6, Scotland, Wales and London will choose their new parliament, senedd and assembly respectively. Mayors for all the main English conurbations will be elected. Votes will be held for almost all English councils – metropolitan, county and district. Apart from residents of a few rural areas, every British elector will have a vote. Their choices will determine the fate of every significant politician outside parliament.
In terms of outcomes, as distinct from statistics, the elections to Scotland’s parliament matter most. Last time, the SNP fell two seats short of an outright majority. However, with the support of five Green members on most issues, they have been able to govern fairly comfortably. Scotland’s voting system is broadly proportional: winning outright is not easy. Only once in the five elections since devolution has a party achieved that goal: the SNP in 2011.
Until recently, polls suggested they could do it again this May. However, the Salmond-Sturgeon dispute has cost the SNP support, at least in the short term. Nobody can be sure whether the party will rebound or slip back further in the next eight weeks. Either way, the election result will have a major impact on Scotland’s future. An outright SNP victory would put acute pressure on Boris Johnson to allow a second referendum on independence.
This is something the government in London has so far refused to countenance. In contrast, a clear SNP victory would certainly heighten the tensions between Edinburgh and London.
In Wales, it is Labour that hopes to gain the two seats it needs for a majority – again, under a broadly proportional voting system.
It will be some achievement if Labour succeeds: in recent years, the Conservatives have been snapping at its heels; last spring, the Tories briefly went ahead in Welsh polling. Since then Labour has re-established a modest lead. Its challenge now is not just to see off the Conservatives and Plaid Cymru; it is also to pick up some of the seven seats that the now near-defunct UKIP won in 2016.
One other thing is worth noting beyond England’s borders. This year Wales will join Scotland in giving the vote to 16- and 17-year-olds. How long before the franchise is extended for the whole of Britain?
In England, the biggest contest is for London’s mayor. Last time Labour’s Sadiq Khan won comfortably. The Conservative candidate, Shaun Bailey, hopes to repeat Boris Johnson’s achievement in defeating Labour in 2008 and 2012. He shouldn’t give up the day job: London has been moving steadily Labour’s way in recent years. Even in the 2019 general election, when Labour was hammered in the rest of England, it retained a 16% lead in the capital.
Exclusive polling for The New European puts Khan 24 points ahead of Bailey. Excluding don’t knows, he has 62%, compared with 38% for Bailey. The survey, by Deltapoll and completed on February 22, should cause little surprise. However, it flatly contradicts Bailey’s claim that private Conservative polling puts him in the lead. Neither the candidate nor his party has disclosed any details. His claim defies all sense. It sounds like fake news. Khan should win easily. A trickier question is whether Labour can gain the extra seat it needs to win a majority in the London assembly.
Andy Burnham should also secure a second term as mayor of Greater Manchester. He won 63% of the vote in 2017 and looks impregnable. Less certain is the mayoralty of the West Midlands. In 2017 Andy Street narrowly defeated Labour’s Sion Simon: his margin of victory was less than 4,000 out of a total vote of almost half a million. Labour would love to take control of a region that has tended historically to side with whichever party is ahead nationally.
However, Labour suffered badly in the 2019 general election, losing nine of the 24 seats it had won in 2017. Liam Byrne – Labour’s candidate and, like Burnham, a former cabinet minister – is the kind of smart, practical and moderate candidate who represents a clean break with the Labour Party of the Corbyn years. Victory, or even a narrow defeat, would show that voters are beginning to warm to the party’s shift away from the left.
Conversely, a Conservative victory in West Yorkshire (the area around Leeds and Bradford) would show that Labour is still being hammered in the “red wall” parts of the north where it lost parliamentary seats just over a year ago. This May sees West Yorkshire’s first mayoral election. Labour’s candidate, Tracy Brabin, is familiar to voters as a former actress on Coronation Street and EastEnders. More recently, she was elected MP for Batley and Spen following the murder of Jo Cox.
West Yorkshire used to be solid Labour territory. The last time Labour was in government, it held all bar one of the area’s 22 parliamentary seats. In the 2019 general election the Conservatives won nine, and closed the gap in votes to just 6%. If they defeat Brabin, the Tories will be celebrating with something stronger than Yorkshire tea.
If Ben Houchen is also re-elected as the Conservative mayor of Teesside, following his narrow victory in 2017, Labour will have further reason to fear for their future prospects in “red wall” areas.
That said, any single part of England could throw up strange results. The bigger national test for both Labour and the Conservatives – what both Johnson and Sir Keir Starmer will be studying with special care – will be the overall shares of the vote across Britain. After each year’s local elections, Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher project those shares for the Local Government Handbook, taking account of where elections are and are not held. This year, the calculation will be more straightforward than usual, for very few places escape having an election this time.
What is more, the vote-share projection will matter more this year than the other usual measure of success and failure: the number of council seats gained and lost by each party. This is because two years’ worth of elections are being held at the same time. The baseline for some contests is 2016, and for others 2017. In 2016, the two main parties were level-pegging; in 2017 the Tories enjoyed an 11-point nationwide lead in the local elections. It is perfectly possible that the seats last fought in 2016 will see Conservative gains from Labour – while the seats last fought in 2017 will see shifts in the opposite direction.
Had the elections been held last autumn, the Tories could have expected a drubbing. The Government was widely criticised for its handling of the Covid crisis. Labour had edged ahead in the polls. Keir Starmer had overtaken Boris Johnson as the public’s choice to be Prime Minister. Since then, the successful roll-out of the vaccine programme, Rishi Sunak’s Budget and rumblings within Labour over Starmer’s performance have moved the polling dial back in the Tories’ favour. As in Scotland, England’s local elections will come at an unusually tense moment for the main parties.
At this point, a word of caution is necessary. It is tempting to judge local election vote-shares as if they are giant opinion polls. Temping: but risky. Some people split their vote – backing one party for local elections and another for national elections. Turnout figures are also different: many more people vote in general than local elections. Any nationwide assessment needs to take this into account.
The best starting point is a like-for-like comparison with previous years – that is the national pattern revealed by each May’s local elections. The table below shows the figures for the past ten years, and contrasts them with an average of the national polls conducted at around the same time. (2015 is omitted because a general election was held on the same day as local elections, so campaigning was dominated by national issues and turnout was far higher than usual.)
This anal;sis was first published by The New European